Sunday, March 19, 2006

March Media Madness

March MadnessMarch madness has begun, and while I'm spending my spring break frantically working on two chapters of a book I'm writing (well, co-writing), my wife is dragging me into the strange realm of NCAA "March Madness." My wife, like so many people who live and work in an office environment in the United States, has gone and joined a March Madness office pool. And now someone who typically pays little attention to basketball--baseball and football are more her things--is sitting glued to CBS hoping that her first and second round picks make it to the next stage. (Too bad, Syracuse!) As she says: "I know exactly nothing about college basketball. As I was doing my picks, I found myself favoring colleges that I had attended conferences at, or that had offered me graduate assistantships in the past. That's how I ended up with an all Washington state championship game, which has as much chance of happening as I have of being named Queen of Spokane." And because she's getting sucked in through the power of the office pool, I'm getting sucked in too! Maybe the final will be between The Huskies and Gonzaga! :-)

This state of affairs isn't all that uncommon. At this time of year millions of people get sucked into the National Collegiate Athletic Association Men's Division I Basketball Tournament--an event and a sport they often know little of, but which manages to build up the sort of buzz of excitement that any Hollywood movie studio exec would kill to have for their big summer tentpole release. Sixty-four (well, actually 65) college teams are playing (many are already out), and even though four games are on at roughly the same time for the first few days, viewers get to see most of them for at least a few minutes as CBS frantically switches from game to game. But now, for the first time, the games will be available free over the internet on CBS Sportsline. The media have run some stories about employer anxiety over lost productivity (here's NPR's take on a story that's essentially a media creation.) In fact, March Madness facilitates a powerful centripetal media effect on society. That's a fancy way of saying it's one of these great sports events that can bring people together--in offices, in clubs, in families, and across the whole country--through the power of a media spectacle. People, even those who normally care not a whit about basketball, get caught up in, bet a few bucks on (and for most people, it is only a few bucks), and feel they're part of something special that's bigger than they are. It gives people something to talk about, something to riff on, something to get excited about. It's like the Super Bowl but it lasts for 20 days. It gets lots of people through the dreary month of March, and by the time it's all over the weather will be getting warmer--and baseball season will be upon us!

Now, ahem, back to writing that book!

7 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

I have to agree with you on many points that you said in this blurb. I am not a huge basketball fan, but the NCAA tournament catches my attention. Watching the close games and over times, keeps my on the edge of my seat, even if I don't have a favorite team...I generally cheer for the underdogs. It was frustrating the first few days with CBS having to bounce from game to game and not knowing what was happening with others, but other than that, the coverage of the NCAA's has been impressive and I can't wait till the final four.

-Kristen Greiner

3/20/2006 12:49 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I agree that the NCAA Tournament is a unifying event, bringing both nonchalant and diehard fans together. Even my mother filled out a bracket! However, when the brackets fail to be pleasing to the eyes (especially this season – can someone say “the Missouri Valley Conference?”), I feel as though people are dissuaded from watching the remainder of the Big Dance. Consider the three following power conferences: the Big East, Big Ten, and Big XII. Their conference tournament champions were Syracuse, Iowa, and Kansas, respectively. How did these teams fare in the first round? They lost to Texas A&M, Northwestern State, and Bradley, respectively. Although everyone pulls for the upset, at what point do a couple of points in an office pool surpass the love of the game? Do conferences such as the Missouri Valley Conference and the Patriot League help or hurt viewers’ interest? Do we really want to see Duke and Connecticut every year, or should we be accustomed to the emergence of the mid-majors? Consequently, it seems as though no matter how many games we watch during the season, the brackets boil down to mere flips of a coin and bragging rights.

Laura Salvalzo

3/21/2006 1:07 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Looking back on this post now that the Final Four has been set, I think to some extent that viewers will be turned off from watching the Final Four (now that George Mason University has wrecked in all likelihood 99% of office pools nationwide). However, having a story like Mason's tournament run thus far brings a new aspect into the picture in regards to the tournament - never before has a school accomplished what Mason has in '06.

George Mason, as they entered the tournament this year, had never even won an NCAA tournament game! Two weeks later they've "danced" their way to the Final Four and pulled off what ESPN anchor Stuart Scott termed "the greatest upset in NCAA Tournament history" by defeating Connecticut. It's stories like this that, while wrecking office pools and frustrating Connecticut fans, makes this event enjoyable to watch. The team's accomplishments are spun off as extremely inspirational, and in reality, they truly are amazing.

The coverage of the tournament by CBS in my mind has been superb. I've watched the Tournament since I was 10 years old, and never before have I been more in tune with what's occurring in every game - even as I lost some interest as the "big-name" schools were losing. I especially liked the Internet feature in which you can watch games online. Now you literally can see every game! I love March Madness...

3/27/2006 12:45 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Oops... forgot my name in the above post... Brian Galliford

3/27/2006 12:45 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

March Madness is really an event like no other. No matter who you talk to regardless if they no anything at all about basketball, it seems everyone has their bracket in some pool. Which even though may be for only a few bucks, is still gambling when you get down to it. I am an avid sports fan, maybe not so much as interested in college basketball as other sports but during March it seems as its the only events that matter. What I think makes this event so universal is that there is no real way of "predicitng your brackets" even if you are an expert. People who may know nothing about the sport may win there pools. With this universal interest in the tournament we seem to be forgetting a key issue. The NCAA has a strong policy against gambling, yet this seems to be the most bet on event, if not second to the Super Bowl. I am not against creating brackets and pools for this tournament at all because of the strong national interest that it creates. But as a whole, doesn't it seem a little bit hypocritical?


--David Utnick

3/27/2006 2:56 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I would like to expand on an idea brought up in the previous comment. The idea that the NCAA tournament is probably (I would say so at least) bet on even more than the Super Bowl. The NCAA frequently sanctions schools around the country for recruiting violations and academic scandals, yet they seem to turn their back to this problem. As David said, the NCAA has a strong policy against gambling, but it seems they just throw that policy out the window when it is tournament time. Could it possibly be because the NCAA makes most of its money during the tournament through advertising? Do you think nearly as many viewers would tune in if they didn't have some stake in the tournament (financially or otherwise)? Absolutely not. That point is made clear in the original post by Professor Bicket and the comments so far. Everyone mentions how even casual fans or people that don't care at all about sports tune in to March Madness simply because they filled out a bracket in some office pool. It does seem quite hypocritical of the NCAA to be strict on gambling until it benefits them most.

3/28/2006 11:42 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

..oops, forgot my name too...Nick Feely

3/28/2006 11:42 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home