Saturday, October 15, 2005

Can we avoid the ads? part 2

Gary Levin in USA Today brings us up to speed on the glut of ads and promos now overwhelming network primetime television. In the absence of any federal agency to regulate commercial time on television - neither the FCC nor the FTC regulate this - networks are free to put on as many ads as they like. The National Association of Broadcasters, the industry's lobby group, ran a voluntary code up till 1982, whereby commercials were limited "to 9.5 minutes per hour in prime time. But since the code was dropped, the number of commercials on prime-time TV has crept steadily higher." How high? Just about doubled, that's how high.
    Across prime-time TV, the number of ads and promos has increased sharply over the years. A typical “one-hour” prime-time series clocks in at less than 42 minutes, down from 44 minutes several years ago and nearly 48 minutes in the 1980s. And shaving off the “previously on …” recap, opening credits and a teaser for next week's episode, Sunday's [Desperate] Housewives ran 40 minutes and 30 seconds, meaning for every two minutes of programming, there's a minute of commercials or promos for other network shows.

This problem runs across the board (or spectrum) and into cable TV as well, where "clutter" on channels such as MTV, USA and Lifetime is even worse. But Levin focuses attention on two of ABC's top shows - Lost and Desperate Housewives. ABC is the worst offender in terms of overloading its shows with ads, studies show - and this is further exacerbated by a recent change in how that network formats its primetime shows.
    Until recently, dramas unfolded in four segments, or “acts,” often preceded by an introductory teaser that aired before the opening credits. Starting this fall, ABC required all drama producers to carve up each episode into six portions. For some shows, including Housewives, the first segment runs for nine to 11 minutes before the first break. Once viewers are hooked, they're confronted with four more commercial breaks, each about 3½ minutes long, over the next 45 minutes. To prevent channel surfing, networks increasingly avoid airing commercials between shows. Instead, they save several minutes of more substantial scenes for a show's ending and then move “seamlessly” into the next program.

The last tactic of "seamless" transitions between shows has been adopted by all the networks for some years now. But ABC's strategy overall takes it to a new low. The first time I noticed this new strategy, while watching Lost - one of the very few shows on network TV I try to watch - I was quite annoyed, to say the least. Yet it is surely set to become the norm.

Stepping back for a moment: It is amazing how quickly this problem is manifesting itself. As recently as April 2004, Television Week was excoriating three of the "Big Four" networks for broadcasting more than 15 minutes of "nonprogram'' material every hour during prime time in 2003. It noted then that one network, ABC, had breached 15 minutes per hour. Now ABC is close to breaching 20 minutes per hour of nonprogram material. Just how much more can viewers stand?

I know I'm ready to switch off, even though my wife loves Lost. One friend of ours now refuses to watch the show and has a simple alternative: He's waiting for the DVD to come out.

11 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ads/commercials are something that cannot be ignored on prime time TV, no matter how hard the viewer tries. But this, like other trends, will hopefully die out after viewers become so annoyed with the excessive ads that commercials are actually counterproductive. Personally I have been turned off by certain products based on their commercials alone. At the rate commercial time is growing it is inevitable that networks will take it a step too far and have to cut back drastically to maintain real-time viewers. Also with the increasing use of products similar to TiVo and season DVD sets of shows, networks will eventually have to ween themselves off of commercials and start producing more TV.
-Colleen Keltz

10/16/2005 8:32 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

It seems to me that today's television audience has been not only expanded in terms of the demographics that it reaches, but also cheapened to a new low in many ways. Commercials are just one aspect, but the boom in "reality tv" over the past 5 years or so has had its effects as well, as even it has gradually become increasingly less sophisticated. It started off with MTV's "The Real World" and CBS' "Survivor", but has since morphed into something entirely different. Enthused by viewers gobbling up anything and everything "reality", the spin-offs have sunk to lower and lower levels. MTV has a running show called "The Surreal Life" where fans can watch a seemingly random assortment of washed-up, past their prime celebrities live together. Or better yet, look at MTV's "My Super Sweet 16", where audiences seemingly delight in watching snobby millionare girls fret and fuss over their 16th birthday party as if human survival is at stake. It just seems to me that television in general has been getting more and more cheap and unbearable every year, yet the mass public continues to be fascinated.

~Travis Cass

10/17/2005 2:19 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Ads and commercials are necessary for the success of the television industry, however it is clear that the amount of these ads has increased drastically in the past years. I don't think I would go as far as to not watch one of my favorite shows just because of the commercials, I usually just tune out during them. Luckily, alternate options such as television show DVD's and TiVo are becoming more popular. I was shocked to read that the latest Desperate Housewives show only aired for 40 minutes of "real" time. It is only a matter of time before commercials will dominate a television time slot, and audiences will simply stop watching. Until then we are stuck with annoying commercials and often over-bearing product placement.
-Lauren Austin

10/17/2005 8:21 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

In addition to the others that have commented, I have really begun to notice the continually increasing amount of commercials on television. Not only in primetime dramas or made for TV movies, but also in many sporting contests that are aired. NBA, NCAA Basketball and MLB for example use things such as 'TV Timeouts' or even slow down the pace between innings so that they can allow the networks to show the commercials that they think will most affect the viewing public at the time. This really does something to hurt the game. Who wants to watch the final 10 minutes or last few innings of a playoff game and be disrupted frequently so that the networks can show 3 ½ to 5 minutes of commercials at a time.


Ed Green

10/18/2005 3:59 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Well, I think we all know how to avoid commercials- just channel surf or watch two shows at the same time, and go back and forth. Too bad commercials pretty much consume ALL stations, so no longer does my channel surfing strategy work.I guess there's nothing we can do, besides protest all the terrible commercials out there- the least that ads could do is be somewhat exciting or interesting, or Funnnyyy; but only about one out of every 7 commercials can catch anyones attention, all the others are just irritating, and viewers would rather be chewing on tin foil. My mom is sales manager at a radio station back home, so i know how much televison/radio rely on advertising, along with those who work for the station, but maybe we can start trying to make ads that appeal to more of us who are watching; cause regardless of how good you think your commercials are, they really make me want to poke my eyes out.



-erica dingeman

10/18/2005 6:09 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

Taking into account all that has been said before me, I'll try not to be too redundant. I think that ads are a necessary part of network programming and that the presence of them is not necessarily what is in contention here. However, I agree that the amount of ads has become excessive. But do commercials seem excessive because of the compared amount to years past? Look at the magazine industry, where ads litter almost every other page. We may not think anything of it, because we can scan through them quickly, passing over the ones that aren't interesting and further exploring the ones that are. I doubt the TV industry will reduce the number of ads now, so we mind as well start planning other activities while we watch TV. Maybe speculating about the show during the commercials will become the norm and you won't remember the time when breaks were so short you couldn't discuss "who killed who" or "who did what." TV may recreate what some say it killed years ago: real human interaction in place of the televised kind.
-Libby Donaldson

10/19/2005 10:27 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

First of all I think that the producers are taking a great risk in allowing the surplus of comercials into mainstream media. It is posable for the general public to assume a view of TV as nothing more than a medium for ads. If that happened, the public would turn to DVD's and other alternative forms of entertainment that could literally put them out of buisness. Second, in addidion to the "seamless" show transitions, they have also removed the little sound bite that they used to play before resuming the show. The idea is that if the sound bite isn't there to tell the viewers that the show is back, they might not leave or do anything else out of fear of missing the show. I think this is a shameful way for the producers to promate the ads. My third and finnal point is that I am amazed that the sport programs would shift the game's timing to better accommodate the ads. At this point the ads arn't just annoying to TV watchers, but they are actually infringing on the enjoyment of the fans, who have paid to see the game and get stuck with commercial breaks anyway. The general rule as far as my understanding, was you either payed for or bought the product, or had to deal with the torrent of ads. This shaping of the game it's self to TV's ideal timing is a despicable act by the producers and a violation of the privileges that the fans purchased. They are at the feild because they chose to buy tickets instead of watch it on ESPN, but they may as well not bother if they are suffering from the same stop and go format that TV broadcasts.

~Christian Foster

10/19/2005 1:41 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

For the past few years I've drifted farther and farther away from the television set. There are only certain shows or events I can stand watching (sporting events mostly). While part of my viewing demise is due to the content, a good portion of it is also due to way too many ads. The networks I usually watch (Comedy Central and ESPN) have very short commercial breaks compared to ABC or MTV. This makes it much easier for my short attention span to stay in check. I've accepted the fact that commercial breaks are only going to get worse as the years go on, but it may be wishful to think eventually networks will catch on and realize how much people hate having twenty minutes of commercials in, what's supposed to be, an hour long show. Several years ago, NBC played the entire, uncut version of Schindler's List. The NBC viewing was sponsored by Ford and there was only one intermission throughout the three and a half hour movie. That may be something for networks to think about. Instead of commercials, have certain shows sponsored by numerous companies. This would hopefully reduce commercial air time and make people interested in TV again...then again it's kind of a good thing that people are moving away from the television set. right?

-Rich Pulvino

10/20/2005 10:13 AM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I don't know what I can say about commercials other than I hate them. I am not happy with the amount or content of the commercials. It has become a phenomenon in some cases like that of the Superbowl. I know that in the past few years people end up talking about the commercials that ran during the game instead of the game itself. It has also come to my attention that commercials have snuck their way into movie theaters. I thought that the reason we go to the movies is to watch it without commercials. Oh the little slides or cartoons at the beginning that tell you to buy candy and popcorn never really bothered me. It is the car commercials and the pepsi commercials before the previews that really make me angry. The thing that really bothers me is the way that they just sort of snuck in without anyone knowing. All of a sudden they were just there, no one could say when it started but I want it to end. Besides, I hate it when the commercial makes me think it is a preview for a cool new movie and I feel like a moron when its an ad for coke.

Laura Vasile

10/24/2005 6:55 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

I rarely watch TV but it is hard to ignore how much time is being taken up by commercials. My question is, how much influence do commercials have on their viewing audience? When I do watch TV I sometimes only view commericials as another source of entertainment. I hardly ever think about those products that I see on TV. So many people tune into the Super Bowl every year "just to watch the commercials". Companies usually don't give enough information about their product for people to want to go buy it. I've seen commercials for medicine and they never even mention what the medicine is meant to cure. I think companies are wasting their money buy ad space and creating very expensive ads when people don't pay much attention to them anyway, or if they do pay attention it's not because of the product but the quality of the commercial that caught people's attention.

Samantha Hall

11/05/2005 10:07 PM  
Anonymous Anonymous said...

As annoying as the majority of commercials are, it also seems that some people are watching commercials now as intently as they watch the actual television program. I have friends who'll stop channel surfing when they see a commercial that they find especially funny or entertaining. Commercials are getting more creative in catching the public's attention, and even fool us sometimes into not even realizing that we are watching a commercial to begin with. What immediately comes to mind within this new trend of advertising are the string of Geico commercials. As annoying as we may find the majority of commercials that interrupt our shows to be, they're still good amount that are definitely catching our attention, and even entertaining us as much as the tv programs are.

11/10/2005 3:41 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home